IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Paul C wrote on Friday, May 30:1. Demographic transition or conversion is a well attested empirical> I dont claim any expertise on demographics, but it is fairly evident
> that once a country becomes fully industrialised the birth rate falls
> dramatically.
> Reasons for this will be many, the dissolution of patriarchal economic
> relations and the participation of women in the labour market, the
> availability of contraception on a general basis, the replacement
> of filial piety by state pensions and mutual funds. Whatever the
> detailed causes, the fact remains that a couple of generations after
> industrialisation capitalist countries seem dependent on immigration
> to ensure population growth.With the possible exception of increasing participation of women in
the labour market, there is no reason to think that any of the above
developments are *necessary* consequences of the development of
capitalism. So, if your explanation for population change ultimately
rests on accidental or historically contingent reasons, then your
explanation for why the OCC rises and the rate of profit will fall
also becomes subject to historical accident and contingency. Since
you also, on May 20, refer to how this contradiction will "seal its fate",
your explanation implies that whether the fate of capitalism will be
"sealed" depends on whether the contingencies that you have suggested
re population change actually develop as you anticipate.
2. My explanation of it is certainly not complete, but all of the features
that I mention are common place attributes of capitalist
development.
What does it mean to say that they are not *necessary*
consequences,
other than that we have not yet come up with an
understanding of
the causal process generating them. This reflects
our ignorance
more than anything else.
In solidarity, Jerry
-- Paul Cockshott Dept Computing Science University of Glasgow 0141 330 3125
- Re: (OPE-L) Rising organic composition (was: From Ian Wright on Weeks....), (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) Rising organic composition (was: From Ian Wright on Weeks....), Paul Cockshott Tue 27 May 2003, 10:17 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Rising organic composition (was: From Ian Wright on Weeks....), Rakesh Bhandari Thu 29 May 2003, 20:37 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Rising organic composition (was: From Ian Wright on Weeks....), clyder Fri 30 May 2003, 08:46 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Rising organic composition, gerald_a_levy Fri 30 May 2003, 13:40 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Rising organic composition, Paul Cockshott Fri 30 May 2003, 13:58 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Rising organic composition (was: From Ian Wright on Weeks....), Rakesh Bhandari Fri 30 May 2003, 17:10 GMT
- some books on demographics, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 30 May 2003, 17:56 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Rising organic composition (was: From Ian Wright on Weeks....), Allin Cottrell Sat 31 May 2003, 04:51 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Rising organic composition (was: From Ian Wright on Weeks....), Rakesh Bhandari Sat 31 May 2003, 16:44 GMT