IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Re Michael E's message dated Friday, May 23: > This presupposes that only a Marxist materialist analysis is credible. But > is issue of Marxist materialism is an ontological issue which, to boot, > is highly controversial. We come back to the ontological issue of the > validity of the LTV, the foundation stone in Marx's critique of > capitalism as a mode of (social) production and exchange. No, not every question comes back to 'the ontological issue of the validity of the LTV.' The issue under discussion was the facts regarding the current situation in Cuba. An appeal to the LTV and ontology will not help us comprehend this current development. We have seen that there are (at least) two different narratives for what has been happening in Cuba. To access the relative merit of those two narratives, we have to explore the factual underpinnings (or lack thereof) of each perspective. In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: (OPE-L) dreams and nightmares, (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) dreams and nightmares, Paul Bullock Thu 22 May 2003, 14:50 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) dreams and nightmares, Nicola Taylor Fri 23 May 2003, 04:20 GMT
- (OPE-L) a materialist analysis of the situation in Cuba, gerald_a_levy Fri 23 May 2003, 11:00 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) a materialist analysis of the situation in Cuba -- LTV, Michael Eldred Fri 23 May 2003, 20:10 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: a materialist analysis of the situation in Cuba -- LTV, gerald_a_levy Tue 27 May 2003, 12:11 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: a materialist analysis of the situation in Cuba -- LTV, Michael Eldred Wed 28 May 2003, 15:53 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) dreams and nightmares, Paul Bullock Fri 23 May 2003, 14:30 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) dreams and nightmares -- LTV, Michael Eldred Fri 23 May 2003, 20:10 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) dreams and nightmares -- LTV, Paul Bullock Tue 27 May 2003, 17:12 GMT