IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Nicola Taylor wrote: > Right, it is a key point. If the Cuban government can indeed rely on > widespread popular support, and if the opposition is small and unpopular, > why the "necessity" to resort to violent suppression of all internal > dissent? There seems to me a fundamental contradiction in the calls for > internal repression by comrades who in the same breath remind us that the > Cuban people are, in general, grateful to Castro for all that he has done > for them. If Cubans are so grateful that they would defend their > government, and if Castro believed this, then he would have little to fear > from setting in motion a process of democratic reforms. Indeed, there is a > very good chance that Cuba could win widespread internal and international > support for immediate democratic reforms. Nicky and Riccardo and Micheal E. and others, What specific "immediate democratic reforms" do you have in mind? And how would you safeguard against US subversion of the Cuban political process and the gains of the Cuban revolution? Comradely, Fred
- (OPE-L) Re: dreams and nightmares, gerald_a_levy Tue 20 May 2003, 22:57 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: dreams and nightmares, Nicola Taylor Wed 21 May 2003, 01:53 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: dreams and nightmares, michael a. lebowitz Wed 21 May 2003, 02:30 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: dreams and nightmares, Nicola Taylor Wed 21 May 2003, 07:02 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: dreams and nightmares, Fred B. Moseley Thu 22 May 2003, 01:55 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: dreams and nightmares, Paul Bullock Thu 22 May 2003, 11:45 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: dreams and nightmares, Nicola Taylor Fri 23 May 2003, 03:48 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Fwd: Re: (OPE-L) Re: dreams and nightmares, michael a. lebowitz Fri 23 May 2003, 06:28 GMT
- on Cuba, Diego Guerrero Tue 20 May 2003, 10:57 GMT