IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Riccardo, Nicky, Chris, Simon, and everyone else: I hear everyone on the list (with the possible exception of Michael E) saying that we should oppose U.S. aggression towards Cuba, which includes the economic blockade, and support the right of Cuba to self-determination. *IF* that is indeed the case, shouldn't we all be able to support the immediate and unconditional freeing of the Cuban 5? If the National Lawyers Guild was able to agree to that (see http://www.nlg.org/cuba/miami5res.htm), why can't we? In solidarity, Jerry
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', (continued)
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', Allin Cottrell Fri 23 May 2003, 02:40 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', dashyaf Wed 21 May 2003, 10:53 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', Rakesh Bhandari Wed 21 May 2003, 15:46 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', Rakesh Bhandari Wed 21 May 2003, 15:50 GMT
- (OPE-L) The Cuban Five (was: 'dreams and nightmares'), glevy Wed 21 May 2003, 16:59 GMT
- Re: value, labour and conservation laws, Ian Wright Wed 21 May 2003, 03:56 GMT
- Re: value, labour and conservation laws, Andrew Brown Wed 21 May 2003, 09:12 GMT
- Re: value, labour and conservation laws, Paul Cockshott Wed 21 May 2003, 09:54 GMT
- Re: value, labour and conservation laws, Michael Eldred Fri 23 May 2003, 20:10 GMT