IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
. As Fidel told the foreign participants to the Marx conference at an unannounced evening gathering (and subsequently told a Mexican journalist), the choice was between those deaths and many more which would result from the US plan to provoke an immigration crisis which would be used 'as a pretext for a naval blockade, which would inevitably lead to war'.
Michael, this is what I don't understand. Please explain. The US encourages hijackings by not prosecuting or returning hijackers; hijackings escalate and very illegal immigration explodes; Bush then rallies the US populace for a war against Castro in order to democratize Cuba so that illegal emigration ceases? I just don't see Bush selling such a justification to the US populace or thinking that he has any chance of imposing his regime in Cuba.
How about simply what Fidel said--- ie., a naval blockade which cuts off, eg, the oil from Venezuela? Add to that measures that cut-off remittances, trade, etc. Expel the Cuban Interests section as spies (14 thrown out this week), call upon the coalition of the all-too-willing (especially Spain) to support this squeeze, and encourage a general deterioration in the Cuban economy, hope for and support demonstrations and riots, etc. I hope you don't think the US media (Fox, CNN, etc) would challenge the message that it is time to put an end to the suffering of the Cuban people. Do I think this scenario is possible? I think it is less so--- given Cuba's determined actions. in solidarity, michael
--------------------- Michael A. Lebowitz Professor Emeritus Economics Department Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Currently based in Cuba. Can be reached via:
Michael Lebowitz c/o MEPLA Calle 13 No. 504 ent. D y E, Vedado, La Habana, Cuba Codigo Postal 10 4000 (537) 33 30 75 or 832 21 54 telefax (at night): (537) 33 30 75
- NYTimes.com Article: Fear of a Quagmire?, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 24 May 2003, 07:15 GMT
- More re 'dreams and nightmares', michael a. lebowitz Wed 21 May 2003, 05:19 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', Rakesh Bhandari Wed 21 May 2003, 05:58 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', Nicola Taylor Wed 21 May 2003, 09:01 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', michael a. lebowitz Wed 21 May 2003, 15:18 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', Allin Cottrell Fri 23 May 2003, 02:40 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', dashyaf Wed 21 May 2003, 10:53 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', Rakesh Bhandari Wed 21 May 2003, 15:46 GMT
- Re: More re 'dreams and nightmares', Rakesh Bhandari Wed 21 May 2003, 15:50 GMT