IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Paul C wrote
on Tuesday, May 20:
> It (Capitalism, JL) is inherently a transitory mode
> of production that can only persist so long as it is surrounded > by pre-capitalist production. *Why* can't
capitalism persist after the disappearance of
pre-capitalist
production?
In solidarity,
Jerry
|
- Re: [OPE-L:8609] From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, (continued)
- Re: [OPE-L:8609] From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, Paul Cockshott Mon 19 May 2003, 10:02 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L:8609] From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, Ian Wright Mon 19 May 2003, 08:58 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L:8609] From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 20 May 2003, 01:22 GMT
- Re: [OPE-L:8609] From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, Paul Cockshott Tue 20 May 2003, 08:57 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, gerald_a_levy Tue 20 May 2003, 12:45 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, Paul Cockshott Tue 20 May 2003, 14:18 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, Paul Bullock Wed 21 May 2003, 08:13 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, Paul Cockshott Wed 21 May 2003, 09:27 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: From Ian Wright on Weeks and Simple Commodity Production, Paul Zarembka Wed 21 May 2003, 12:28 GMT