IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
I wrote: > Of course, in practice, there is not a > money commodity and even when there was we still only required > any old unit of account. I had in mind any old *symbols* (eg paper notes) for the unit of account, i.e. for commodity money; these can perform the medium of exchange function, of course, in a commodity money system. Andy
- (OPE-L) Re: a genius?, (continued)
- (OPE-L) Re: a genius?, gerald_a_levy Wed 14 May 2003, 11:24 GMT
- Re: value and labour, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 13 May 2003, 19:02 GMT
- Re: value and labour, clyder Thu 15 May 2003, 14:16 GMT
- Re: value and labour, Andrew Brown Thu 15 May 2003, 14:53 GMT
- Re: value and labour; clarification, Andrew Brown Thu 15 May 2003, 15:31 GMT
- Re: value and labour, clyder Fri 16 May 2003, 14:32 GMT
- Re: value and labour, Andrew Brown Mon 19 May 2003, 16:45 GMT
- Re: value, labour and conservation laws, Paul Cockshott Tue 20 May 2003, 08:51 GMT
- Re: value, labour and conservation laws, Michael Eldred Tue 20 May 2003, 15:39 GMT