IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Paul C wrote
on Wednesday, May 07:
> Eyes in vertebrates are systematically connected to the primary
> visual cortex and cannot function without it. Thus it is clear > eyes are specific and particular form of development of the > vertebrate nervous system, and in consequence - appearances > to the contrary, molluscs are eyeless. Indeed mollusks are eyeless. But, who was
talking about
mollusks? Ontological conceptions vary
with the subject matter.
Thus, how we strive to systematically comprehend a
subject
matter varies depending upon the intrinsic nature
of the
subject matter itself. The analysis of
capitalism requires the
systematic enrichment and exposition of categories
of social
form specific to that mode of production.
That doesn't include
eyes or lack of eyes. But it does mean that, for instance, the
commodity-form and
the value-form and the money-form and
the capital-form must be grasped within the context of the totality
of capitalism.
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- Re: (OPE-L) subjects and objects in capitalism, (continued)
- Re: (OPE-L) subjects and objects in capitalism, wpc Fri 09 May 2003, 20:19 GMT
- (OPE-L) and the winner of the 2004 Nobel Peace Prize is ... ?, gerald_a_levy Fri 09 May 2003, 14:24 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: (OPE-L) and the winner of the 2004 Nobel Peace Prize is ... ?, mongiovg Fri 09 May 2003, 20:25 GMT
- (OPE-L) 'Capitalism' -- a Board Game, gerald_a_levy Thu 08 May 2003, 12:54 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: is value labour?, gerald_a_levy Thu 08 May 2003, 12:40 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: is value labour?, Paul Cockshott Thu 08 May 2003, 14:17 GMT
- OPE-L: is value labour?, Asfilho Thu 08 May 2003, 05:25 GMT
- Re: OPE-L: is value labour?, Paul Cockshott Thu 08 May 2003, 09:07 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: OPE-L: is value labour?, Asfilho Thu 08 May 2003, 10:16 GMT