IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
I think you over state this. Marx was interested in the determination of the
price system, but he was also interested in the social forms and in their
transitory character. The effort Marx put into theorising prices of
production indicates that he was interested in prices. He was attempting
a theory that was more general than Ricardo's, without repudiating the
key components of Ricardo's theory.
- (OPE-L) Re: is value labour?, gerald_a_levy Thu 08 May 2003, 12:40 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: is value labour?, Paul Cockshott Thu 08 May 2003, 14:17 GMT
- OPE-L: is value labour?, Asfilho Thu 08 May 2003, 05:25 GMT
- Re: OPE-L: is value labour?, Paul Cockshott Thu 08 May 2003, 09:07 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: OPE-L: is value labour?, Asfilho Thu 08 May 2003, 10:16 GMT
- is value labour?, Asfilho Wed 07 May 2003, 13:45 GMT
- Re: is value labour?, Paul Cockshott Wed 07 May 2003, 15:12 GMT
- Re: is value labour?, Paul Zarembka Fri 23 May 2003, 13:51 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: is value labour?, glevy Fri 23 May 2003, 15:52 GMT