IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
--RE: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 11:53 AM -0300 Claus Magno <cmgermer@xxxxxxx>
Claus,
I find two phrases of your sentences contradictory: "the substance of value is abstract labour, i.e., the expenditure of human productive effort irrespective of its concrete form" compared to "value is objectified labour". Agreeing with the former, I don't understand how, then, 'abstract labor' could be 'objectified labor'.
Paul
*********************************************************************** "Confronting 9-11, Ideologies of Race, and Eminent Economists", Vol. 20 RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Paul Zarembka, editor, Elsevier Science ******************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
- Re: Inflation, credit, and the 'money expression of labour' within a value-form perspective, (continued)
- Re: Inflation, credit, and the 'money expression of labour' within a value-form perspective, Paul Cockshott Tue 06 May 2003, 09:02 GMT
- (OPE-L) is value labour?, gerald_a_levy Tue 06 May 2003, 13:13 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) is value labour?, Paul Cockshott Tue 06 May 2003, 14:07 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) is value labour?, Claus Magno Tue 06 May 2003, 14:53 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) is value labour?, Paul Zarembka Wed 07 May 2003, 21:20 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) is value labour?, Claus Magno Thu 08 May 2003, 20:08 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) is value labour?, Paul Zarembka Fri 09 May 2003, 13:55 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) is value labour?, Claus Magno Fri 09 May 2003, 20:20 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) is value labour?, Howard Engelskirchen Sat 10 May 2003, 03:49 GMT