OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

Re: is value labour?

To: OPE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: is value labour?
From: Claus Magno <cmgermer@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 16:28:44 -0300

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.

I unintentionally sent the previous post before it was completed. I maintain
the first part of it.  I'm sorry, and I cannot complete it now.

Claus.

References:
- is value labour?
  - From: Asfilho
- Re: is value labour?
  - From: Cyrus Bina

Prev by Date: Re: is value labour?
Next by Date: Re: (OPE-L) is value labour?
Previous by thread: Re: is value labour?
Next by thread: Re: is value labour?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- (OPE-L) Re: is value labour?, (continued)
  - Re: is value labour?, Cyrus Bina Wed 07 May 2003, 18:17 GMT
    - Re: is value labour?, Claus Magno Wed 07 May 2003, 19:29 GMT
  - Re: is value labour?, Claus Magno Wed 07 May 2003, 18:57 GMT
  - Re: is value labour?, Paul Zarembka Wed 07 May 2003, 21:29 GMT
    - Re: is value labour?, clyder Wed 07 May 2003, 22:38 GMT
      
      Re: Is value labour?, Michael Eldred Thu 08 May 2003, 16:00 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]