OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

(OPE-L) RE: Eminent physicist refuses to review American colleagues' papers



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Gary wrote on Wednesday, April 30, 2003:

> I'm curious what others think on this matter.

I'm not convinced that it was the best move tactically, but
Daniel Amit's individual action has been largely successful
since we and others are talking about the underlying issues
(including the role of scientists and academics in the US and
UK and whether they share any of the moral responsibility
for the ends that their creations have been put to by the
military establishment in the US and UK).  From the outset,
it has been clear that Daniel Amit sought to publicize this matter
(see below) and stir debate.  It worked.

In solidarity, Jerry

> PS I intend to distribute our exchange as much as possible.
> I authorize and Pray that you do the same.



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]