IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Re Paul B's post of April 24:
Thanks for the references. Here's another article on
the Project for the
New American Century (PNAC) [sub-titled "Cheney's
Monstrous Scheme"] http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_louise_010603_pnac.html
One likely consequence of the war will be a *permanent US
military
presence in Iraq*. The White House has already said
that they would
like to establish 6 or more permanent military bases in
Iraq. This would
give the US government the ability to rapidly deploy its
forces in other
countries in the Middle East and nearby countries in Asia
and Africa.
Even if the "road map" (whatever it is) is followed for
Palestinian
statehood, Palestine would then be surrounded with a huge
Israeli
military presence primarily to the East and a US presence
to the South.
The US could then invade or just threaten to invade
Lebanon, Syria,
Palestine, etc. in search of "terrorists" and the
governments who "condone"
their presence (and, as we know from Afghanistan, the Bush
administration's
post 9-11 stated policy is that governments which harbor
terrorists should
be treated as if they were
themselves terrorist).
The US administration has said that they wish to
'negotiate' the
presence of these military bases with the new Iraqi
government.
But, since the US will control who will be in the new
Iraqi government,
the 'negotiation' will be a farce.
What will happen, looking ahead a few years (?), when
there are
'democratic' elections in Iraq? It would be naive to
think that the US
will allow an Islamic fundamentalist political party to
come to power
-- yet many believe that such a party could get the votes
needed to win
such an election. Similarly, I doubt that the US
will allow the Iraqi
Communist Party (which at one point in the 1950's, before
Saddam,
was the largest political party in Iraq) to have a
significant role in a
new government whatever people want. My guess is
that the US
authority will declare certain political parties to be
supportive of
"terrorism" and ban them. This would, however,
de-legitimize any
'democratic' election from the standpoint of the Iraqi
masses.
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, Paul Bullock Tue 22 Apr 2003, 08:34 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, glevy Wed 23 Apr 2003, 21:28 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, Paul Bullock Thu 24 Apr 2003, 11:43 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, gerald_a_levy Mon 14 Apr 2003, 05:53 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the war Against Iraq, gerald_a_levy Mon 28 Apr 2003, 16:58 GMT
- (OPE-L) Claudio Katz, OPE-L Administrator Sat 12 Apr 2003, 18:50 GMT
- (OPE-L) An Interview with A Marxist, gerald_a_levy Sat 12 Apr 2003, 10:24 GMT
- More on David L's critique of TSS, rakeshb Sat 12 Apr 2003, 00:07 GMT
- Re: More on David L's critique of TSS, Paul Bullock Tue 22 Apr 2003, 11:04 GMT