IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Just to clarify: I think Mark Jones meant to infer Marx's disillusionment with the prospects of revolution in the advanced outposts of capitalism from his having spent so many of his later years on what became The Ethnological Notebooks, ed. Lawrence Krader. I do know that one of Krader's students Cyril Levitt wrote a dissertation on those Notebooks and Marx's formulations as they relate to the nature of medieval Indian society are discussed by Ram Sharan Sharma. Of course the ethnology on which Marx commented has been discussed in forbidding detail by anthropologists. But why did Marx spend time on these questions rather than prepare Capital and TSV for publication? Yours, Rakesh
- Re: Eminent physicist refuses to review American colleagues' papers, (continued)
- Re: Eminent physicist refuses to review American colleagues' papers, Howard Engelskirchen Wed 30 Apr 2003, 03:52 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Antonio Negri is free?, OPE-L Administrator Tue 29 Apr 2003, 10:25 GMT
- Antonio Negri is free ?, gerald_a_levy Mon 28 Apr 2003, 22:46 GMT
- (OPE-L) The last years of Karl Marx, OPE-L Administrator Sun 27 Apr 2003, 23:25 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- (OPE-L) The last years of Karl Marx, rakeshb Mon 28 Apr 2003, 00:13 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) The last years of Karl Marx, Michael Perelman Mon 28 Apr 2003, 00:26 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) The last years of Karl Marx, Paul Bullock Mon 28 Apr 2003, 08:06 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: The last years of Karl Marx, gerald_a_levy Mon 28 Apr 2003, 13:31 GMT
- (OPE-L) The last years of Karl Marx, rakeshb Tue 29 Apr 2003, 00:04 GMT