IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Re Rakesh's post today: > On the question of Israeli or Zionist hegemony, there is much discussion > of anti-Jewish demonology in the Arab world--for example, the > circulation of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the conspiracy > theory that Ariel Sharon dictates US foreign policy and the myth that > the State of Israel warned Jews to stay clear of the 9/11 attacks which > Mossad orchestrated. This is all indeed laughable and indeed pernicious. This has made it way into the mainstream media in the Middle East: at the "Al Jazerrah" website ( http://www.aljazeerah.us ) if you scroll down to the bottom of the page you will see "The Knighthood and the PROTOCOLS." If you click on this, you will read about an Egyptian TV series "A Knight Without a Horse" which included elements of the infamous "Protocols" (indeed, there is a summary of every episode in the series and a link to the "Protocols"). I think this reflects the increased acceptance of right-wing fundamentalist revisionist 'history' and the lack of a credible left alternative mass movement. > What is no less so are the political myths by which the Western > political ruling class is gripped. Bush and Blair truly seem to believe > and to have convinced many others that their war was only against > Saddam, not the Iraqi people whose interests Bush and Blair seem truly > to believe are consonant with their own. Bush and Blair also seem to > believe that widespread anti Americanism has only been whipped up by > those rogues and demagogues from whom they will liberate the eventually > thankful masses--both Arab and Venezuelan. It's unclear to me whether what Bush and Blair "seem to believe" is what they actually believe. It could be that they believe in their own propaganda or it could be that they understand that it is disingenuous and apologetic. There's no way to know unless we were the proverbial fly on the wall (or if we listened to another 'White house tape' that recorded their meetings). If they do believe their own propaganda then they are more dangerous and more disconnected from reality. If that is the case then the recent 'success' in Iraq would encourage them to generalize the experience by assaulting and invading other countries. In solidarity, Jerry
- (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, rakeshb Sun 13 Apr 2003, 18:32 GMT
- Message not available
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, Paul Bullock Tue 22 Apr 2003, 08:34 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, glevy Wed 23 Apr 2003, 21:28 GMT
- Re: (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, Paul Bullock Thu 24 Apr 2003, 11:43 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the War against Iraq, gerald_a_levy Mon 14 Apr 2003, 05:53 GMT
- (OPE-L) Re: Consequences of the war Against Iraq, gerald_a_levy Mon 28 Apr 2003, 16:58 GMT
- (OPE-L) Claudio Katz, OPE-L Administrator Sat 12 Apr 2003, 18:50 GMT
- (OPE-L) An Interview with A Marxist, gerald_a_levy Sat 12 Apr 2003, 10:24 GMT
- More on David L's critique of TSS, rakeshb Sat 12 Apr 2003, 00:07 GMT