IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Re [8712]:
> Iraq will manifestly be better off without Saddam's
fascist regime.
Hi
Ian.
1) On what basis can the current
government in Iraq be said
to be
"fascist"?
2) Why are you assuming that Iraq
"will manifestly be better
off" after Saddam Hussein and the
Ba'ath Party are removed
from power? Is there any
reason to believe that a new (puppet)
government selected by the invading
power will be any better
for the workers and peasants of
Iraq?
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]]
A question on the preceding
paragraph in your short essay
which discussed "the real aims and
the real consequences of
the US led invasion of
Iraq:
* the aims and consequences
that you state are
entirely in
reference to the *region*, the
Middle East, but shouldn't those
(and other) intended aims and
expected consequences
underlying US policy be
put in a *global* context? I.e.
don't
you view US aims in the current
conflict in terms of global US
strategy rather than just
Middle East policy?
In solidarity,
Jerry
|
- [OPE-L:8719] Iraq reports from Russia, gerald_a_levy Tue 08 Apr 2003, 13:26 GMT
- [OPE-L:8716] Your Signature can be added to the WSPJ Statement, Paul Zarembka Sun 06 Apr 2003, 13:52 GMT
- [OPE-L:8713] "After Capitalism"-- new book, gerald_a_levy Sat 05 Apr 2003, 11:37 GMT
- [OPE-L:8712] a case against the war in Iraq, Ian Hunt Sat 05 Apr 2003, 07:03 GMT
- [OPE-L:8714] Re: a case against the war in Iraq, gerald_a_levy Sat 05 Apr 2003, 12:23 GMT
- [OPE-L:8715] Re: Re: a case against the war in Iraq, Ian Hunt Sun 06 Apr 2003, 05:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:8718] fascism and the war in Iraq, gerald_a_levy Mon 07 Apr 2003, 13:48 GMT
- [OPE-L:8720] Marx's Time and Our Own, gerald_a_levy Tue 08 Apr 2003, 16:02 GMT
- [OPE-L:8721] Re: Marx's Time and Our Own, michael a. lebowitz Tue 08 Apr 2003, 17:52 GMT