IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
IMHO the assumption (not law) of equal rates of exploitation and the assumption (not law) of equal profit rates are entirely theoretically justified by the need to isolate the effect of different determinants. What happens to these rates empirically is another question. Chris 17 Bristol Road, Brighton, BN2 1AP, England
- [OPE-L:8537] Christoper Hill, 1912-2003, gerald_a_levy Sun 02 Mar 2003, 15:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:8538] Re: Christoper Hill, 1912-2003, Paul Bullock Mon 03 Mar 2003, 09:31 GMT
- [OPE-L:8545] Re: Christopher Hill, 1912-2003, gerald_a_levy Tue 04 Mar 2003, 13:44 GMT
- [OPE-L:8552] Re: Re: Christopher Hill, 1912-2003, Paul Bullock Wed 05 Mar 2003, 22:42 GMT
- [OPE-L:8533] Re: Re: Re: A possible reason why profit rates do not equalise--belated comment, Christopher Arthur Sun 02 Mar 2003, 00:49 GMT
- [OPE-L:8534] Richard Jones, rakeshb Sun 02 Mar 2003, 07:05 GMT
- [OPE-L:8540] Re: A possible reason why profit rates do not equalise--belated comment, gerald_a_levy Mon 03 Mar 2003, 16:51 GMT
- [OPE-L:8532] Dimitri Dimoulis, OPE-L Administrator Sat 01 Mar 2003, 23:37 GMT
- [OPE-L:8531] Main Contradictions behind War on Iraq, Hans Ehrbar Sat 01 Mar 2003, 18:50 GMT