IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
In the article entitled "Capitalist Crises and
Marxist
Theory: Towards a New Synthesis":
the Uno-school, including listmember Makoto Itoh,
is
described as being "neo-Ricardian". Can we
agree that
this is an inaccurate designation or would anyone
like to
explain why s/he believes it to be
accurate?
btw, some other listmembers including Costas and
David
Y are referred to. This fairly long article was written in 1999
and updated in 2000 and was publish originally in
"Trotskyist International". The author is not
indicated.
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- [OPE-L:6627] Riccardo Bellofiore's Homepage, gerald_a_levy Mon 25 Feb 2002, 13:49 GMT
- [OPE-L:6628] Re: Riccardo Bellofiore's Homepage, Steve Keen Mon 25 Feb 2002, 19:05 GMT
- [OPE-L:6629] Re: Re: Riccardo Bellofiore's Homepage, Steve Keen Mon 25 Feb 2002, 19:20 GMT
- [OPE-L:6626] Gil's Gone, gerald_a_levy Sun 24 Feb 2002, 23:03 GMT
- [OPE-L:6624] Is the Uno-school Neo-Ricardian?, gerald_a_levy Sat 23 Feb 2002, 15:36 GMT
- [OPE-L:6621] what is the more important question?, gerald_a_levy Fri 22 Feb 2002, 02:54 GMT
- [OPE-L:6622] Re: what is the more important question?, nicola taylor Fri 22 Feb 2002, 05:07 GMT
- [OPE-L:6623] Re: what is the more important question?, gerald_a_levy Fri 22 Feb 2002, 15:45 GMT
- [OPE-L:6625] an idea for possible future debates, gerald_a_levy Sun 24 Feb 2002, 16:55 GMT