IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Re Paul C. 6574: [...] > ...and in the recent drive by the USA to >establish military hegemony over central asia. It is also apparent >in the partial re-colonisation of Sierra Leone by the UK. >5. The level of capitalist development is much higher than a >century ago, this limits the scope of potential imperialist development. >The most significant factor here is that both China and India are >now major economic and military powers rather than colonies or >potential colonies. The scope of imperialism thus tends >to be concentrated on Africa and on relatively small and >weak countries in central asia and the middle east. I'd add that the governments of Latin American and the Caribbean countries are, in practice, the representation of the US colonial power and its agents, the IMF and the World Bank. They, and a handful of corrupt local politicians, take the decissions regarding any important matter. In this regard, the only exception is Cuba. The recent events in Argentina may be breaking this in a certain degree but it's early to say. A.
- [OPE-L:6578] From Andrew Kliman, Alejandro Ramos Wed 13 Feb 2002, 19:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:6576] Fwd: Re: Re: * poll: who has advanced political econ omy since Marx? *, Paul Cockshott Wed 13 Feb 2002, 16:45 GMT
- [OPE-L:6587] Imperialism -- Then and Now, gerald_a_levy Fri 15 Feb 2002, 14:23 GMT
- [OPE-L:6602] Re: Imperialism -- Then and Now, dashyaf Sat 16 Feb 2002, 12:19 GMT
- [OPE-L:6575] Imperialism, Alejandro Ramos Wed 13 Feb 2002, 16:14 GMT
- [OPE-L:6574] Re: Re: * poll: who has advanced political econ omy since Marx? * (fwd), glevy Wed 13 Feb 2002, 15:51 GMT
- [OPE-L:6573] N. Sieber, Alejandro Ramos Wed 13 Feb 2002, 15:49 GMT
- [OPE-L:6565] Tugan -> Hilferding and schema; where is Lenin?, Paul Zarembka Wed 13 Feb 2002, 03:39 GMT
- [OPE-L:6564] N. Sieber, Alejandro Ramos Wed 13 Feb 2002, 01:18 GMT