OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

[OPE-L:6537] Re: * poll: who has advanced political economy since Marx?



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Hi Chris. Thanks for your [6335]. A (really) brief question:

>> * Also: is there *any* major part of Marx's theory that the
>>   development of subsequent thought shows needs to be
>>   modified or rejected?
> marx completely failed to grasp the ecological problematic. All
> the  relevant stuff attributes the problem to capital - he does
> not see the use value side is itself an issue. So all the stuff
> in the Marx/green debate is relevant. The implications for 'a
> society of abundance' and what presupposes that is obvious.

Have you read [fellow OPE-Ler] Paul Brukett's _Marx and Nature:
A Red and Green Perspective_ [NY, St. Martin's Press, 1999; ISBN
0-312-21940-7]?

In solidarity, Jerry



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]