IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
|
Re Rakesh's [6511]:
Of course, take your time. In thinking
about this
question re 'totality' and the world market,
(re-) consider
please the meaning
of the following sections of the
_Grundrisse_:
-- p. 108 (all page #s refer to Penguin
edition);
-- pp. 227-28 in particular:
"the world market the CONCLUSION, in
which production
is posited as a TOTALITY
together with all its moments,
but within which, at the same
time, ALL contradictions
come into play. The world market
then, again, forms the
presumption of the WHOLE as
well as its substratum.
Crises are then the general
intimation
which points beyond the
presupposition, and the urge
which drives towards the
adoption of the new historic
form" (emphasis added,
JL)
-- p. 264 in particular:
"Finally the world market.
Encroachment of bourgeois
society over the
state. Crises. Dissolution of the mode of
production and form of
society based on exchange value.
Real positing of
individual labour as social and vice versa".
In solidarity, Jerry
|
- [OPE-L:6520] Re: totality, Christopher Arthur Wed 06 Feb 2002, 22:18 GMT
- [OPE-L:6521] Re: Re: totality, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 06 Feb 2002, 23:17 GMT
- [OPE-L:6518] Obstacle to pluralism removed, glevy Wed 06 Feb 2002, 21:31 GMT
- [OPE-L:6519] Re: "Obstacle" to pluralism "removed", Gil Skillman Wed 06 Feb 2002, 22:19 GMT
- [OPE-L:6512] Re: totality, gerald_a_levy Tue 05 Feb 2002, 16:25 GMT
- [OPE-L:6510] Web resources on political economy at marxists.org, gerald_a_levy Mon 04 Feb 2002, 16:07 GMT
- [OPE-L:6509] RE: * poll: who has advanced political economy since Marx? *, mongiovg Mon 04 Feb 2002, 05:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:6516] Re: RE: * poll: who has advanced political economy since Marx? *, Gil Skillman Wed 06 Feb 2002, 18:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:6525] Re: Re: RE: * poll: who has advanced political economy since Marx? *, Steve Keen Thu 07 Feb 2002, 02:05 GMT