IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Re Fred's [6091]: > In mainstream macroeconomics (in all its versions), profit is not even a > variable in the theory! Similarly, in mainstream macro analyses of > recessions, profit is almost never mentioned, certainly not in academic > journals. I guess it depends on how you define 'mainstream'. Two arguably 'mainstream' schools which include a role for profits as a major variable are: 1) the Austrian strand of marginalism: didn't Bohm-Bawerk, Menger, von Mises, etc. all incorporate profit into their basic macro theory? 2) 'Supply-side' economic theory: isn't the level of corporate profits a crucial variable in that theory that leads to changes in the level of investment and then aggregate supply? In solidarity, Jerry
- [OPE-L:6103] Re: Re: falling profits, (continued)
- [OPE-L:6103] Re: Re: falling profits, Fred B. Moseley Mon 29 Oct 2001, 06:03 GMT
- Message not available
- [OPE-L:6106] Re: Re: Re: falling profits, Patrick L. Mason Mon 29 Oct 2001, 14:30 GMT
- [OPE-L:6089] Re: empirical studies on causes of current world economic crisis?, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 25 Oct 2001, 18:22 GMT
- [OPE-L:6091] falling profits - 2, Fred B. Moseley Fri 26 Oct 2001, 16:18 GMT
- [OPE-L:6097] Re: falling profits, Gerald_A_Levy Fri 26 Oct 2001, 23:33 GMT
- [OPE-L:6084] (no subject), Ranganayakamma N.S. Tue 23 Oct 2001, 01:56 GMT
- [OPE-L:6083] Ernesto Screpanti's _The Fundamental Institutions of Capitalism_ (fwd), glevy Sat 20 Oct 2001, 22:57 GMT
- [OPE-L:6082] (un)subscription problems, glevy Fri 19 Oct 2001, 15:22 GMT
- [OPE-L:6081] Re: Profiting from the WTC demolition (fwd), glevy Thu 18 Oct 2001, 13:21 GMT