OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

[OPE-L:6095] Re: Re: falling profits



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Patrick,
is military keynesianism back in vogue? before the end of the cold war,
military spending made up 6.2 percent of GDP (1986). By the end of Clinton's
administration it was down to 2.9 percent (2001).  I don't think George W. Bush
is willing to run deficits large enough to put military spending back up to its
old Reagan level. If there are to be large deficits, it will be as a result of
ever more regressive tax cuts with spending remaining fairly stable, I believe.
And there shouldn't be a great multiplier from regressive tax cuts. Which of
course is not to say that once that $2 trillion that is now in money markets
eventually comes out from hiding there won't be a sharp recovery in the US. I
do doubt however that the recovery will be strong enough to pull Asia and raw
materials exporters out of their impending depression.
Rakesh





Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]