IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Geert, I have a simple question for you, which I hope clarifies the main point I am trying to make: In a given period, if rent (or interest) were to increase (for whatever reason), and everything else remains the same, would the total surplus-value increase or remain the same, according to Marx's theory? I argue that, according to Marx's theory, the total surplus-value would remain the same, because the total surplus-value is determined by surplus labor, independently of the division of the total surplus-value into individual parts (profit, rent, interest, etc.). Therefore, an increase of rent (that is not due to an increase of surplus labor) would not affect the total surplus-value, but would instead be necessarily offset by a decline in one or more of the other individual parts of surplus-value. Geert, do you agree with this? I sure hope so. This is the main point I have been trying to make. I look forward to your reply. Comradely, Fred
- [OPE-L:5663] Re: Reduction (hegelians), (continued)
- [OPE-L:5663] Re: Reduction (hegelians), Christopher Arthur Fri 25 May 2001, 12:43 GMT
- [OPE-L:5669] Quality-Quantity-Levels, Geert REUTEN Sat 26 May 2001, 01:52 GMT
- [OPE-L:5692] Re: Quality-Quantity-Levels, Fred B. Moseley Wed 30 May 2001, 15:19 GMT
- Message not available
- [OPE-L:5694] Quality-Quantity-Levels, Geert REUTEN Wed 30 May 2001, 19:40 GMT
- [OPE-L:5700] total surplus-value in Marx's theory, Fred B. Moseley Thu 31 May 2001, 15:14 GMT
- [OPE-L:5701] Re: total surplus-value in Marx's theory, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari Thu 31 May 2001, 17:20 GMT
- [OPE-L:5704] Re: Re: total surplus-value in Marx's theory, Fred B. Moseley Thu 31 May 2001, 20:33 GMT
- [OPE-L:5706] Re: Re: Re: total surplus-value in Marx's theory, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari Thu 31 May 2001, 22:04 GMT