IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
First, let us on OPE-L thank Paul for his inquiry, which is a breath of fresh air. That said, I would not presume to advise on a political situation whose particulars I do not know. So I mention one policy tool, not to recommend it but to offer a line of thought that Paul may explore as he judges worthwhile. The idea is that the state takes pieces of equity/ownership and gives longterm bonds in return. The interest in effect pensions off the equity holder. Eventually the bonds mature, but perhaps death and inheritance taxes deal with that situation. Some swaps could be mandatory, while other situations might be voluntary offers when the government wants to put a floor under share prices. The Chinese government used this technique in the early 1950s with national capitalists, and government publications have described details. Charles Andrews Web site for my book is at http://www.LaborRepublic.org
- [OPE-L:5639] the infinite regression critique, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 22 May 2001, 12:46 GMT
- [OPE-L:5642] Re: the infinite regression critique, Allin Cottrell Tue 22 May 2001, 15:33 GMT
- [OPE-L:5651] Re: Re: the infinite regression critique, Ajit Sinha Wed 23 May 2001, 11:14 GMT
- [OPE-L:5645] socialist economic policies in transition period, Paul Tue 22 May 2001, 20:50 GMT
- [OPE-L:5646] Re: socialist economic policies in transition period, charlie Wed 23 May 2001, 00:11 GMT
- [OPE-L:5650] Re: Re: socialist economic policies in transition period, Paul Cockshott Wed 23 May 2001, 10:53 GMT
- [OPE-L:5652] Re: socialist economic policies in transition period, Gerald_A_Levy Wed 23 May 2001, 11:29 GMT
- [OPE-L:5636] Re: Re: Re: Howards [5578] Peculiarities of the equivalent form, paul bullock Mon 21 May 2001, 17:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:5637] Re: Re: Re: Re: Howards [5578] Peculiarities of the equivalent form, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari Mon 21 May 2001, 18:52 GMT