IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Jerry quotes Rakesh (quoting Carchedi, quoting Joan Robinson!), > I think Ajit is saying that Hegelian (sic) value theory has no > answer to Joan Robinson's challenge (dubbed the infinite > regression critique by Carchedi): "the constant capital was > produced in the past by labour time working with then pre-existing > constant capital and so on, ad infinitum backwards. It therefore > cannot be reduced simply to a number of labour hours that can be > added to the net value of the current year. And there is no > advantage in doing so." quoted in Carchedi, 1990, p. 96. And asks: > What other answers have been offered in the literature to the > "infinite regression critique"? This critique seems trivial, dumb. It's hard to believe that Joan Robinson didn't know how to find the limit of a convergent geometric series. Allin.
- [OPE-L:5668] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction, (continued)
- [OPE-L:5668] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari Sat 26 May 2001, 00:52 GMT
- [OPE-L:5659] Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction, Steve Keen Thu 24 May 2001, 00:39 GMT
- Message not available
- [OPE-L:5660] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reduction, Steve Keen Thu 24 May 2001, 00:39 GMT
- [OPE-L:5639] the infinite regression critique, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 22 May 2001, 12:46 GMT
- [OPE-L:5642] Re: the infinite regression critique, Allin Cottrell Tue 22 May 2001, 15:33 GMT
- [OPE-L:5651] Re: Re: the infinite regression critique, Ajit Sinha Wed 23 May 2001, 11:14 GMT
- [OPE-L:5645] socialist economic policies in transition period, Paul Tue 22 May 2001, 20:50 GMT
- [OPE-L:5646] Re: socialist economic policies in transition period, charlie Wed 23 May 2001, 00:11 GMT
- [OPE-L:5650] Re: Re: socialist economic policies in transition period, Paul Cockshott Wed 23 May 2001, 10:53 GMT