OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]
Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

[OPE-L:5553] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: William ofOckam'sRazor and Political Economy

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it. 


Rakesh Narpat Bhandari wrote:

> in 5541 Ajit says of what he calls the traditional interpretation:
>
> >
> >Secondly, this approach must explain how does it take the total
> >social labor as
> >*given* that is supposedly distributed.
>
> Ajit, would you kindly elaborate on exactly what this explanatory burden is?
> Nice to have you back.
> Rakesh

____________________

Well, the question is: is there something given to you (in this case abstract
social labor) before you distribute it. If so, then where does this come from
and how do you know how much of its quantity there is. If not, then does the
distribution of this thing affect its total quantity. In what way the total
quantity and its distribution are related to each other? Cheers, ajit sinha
[ Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]