OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

[OPE-L:5271] Re: the 'estimation' of use-value



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


Jerry,

The discussion you highlight by Marx refers to buyers in general--not
buyers specifically in the M--C--M+ circuit. In general, including both
circuits, use-value will be qualitative--since qualitative use-values drive
the C--M--C circuit, and to be a quantative use-value in the M-_C--M+
circuit (i.e., to be a potential source of surplus-value), an entity must
also have qualitative use-value (i.e., a worker must actually have some
abilities, a commodity must actually have a function).

That qualitative side of use-value is conventional from within the
Classical tradition--it is stuff which does not distinguish Marx from
Ricardo or Smith on this issue. They too, while disavowing what has become
the neoclassical stance that qualitative utility determines price via the
contrivance of marginal utility, accept that an entity must have some
qualitative use-value before it can be a commodity. What does distinguish
Marx is his realisation that this means that use-value is quantitative on
the M--C--M+ circuit.

Steve
At 11:14 AM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
Re the on-going discussion with Steve K over
whether use-value can be expressed quantitatively:

"[Given that the commodity is bought by the
buyer not because it has value but because it
is a 'use-value' and is used for determinate
purposes, it is perfectly self-evident, 1. that
use-values are 'estimated' [geschaatzt], i.e.
their *quality* is investigated (just as their
*quantity* is weighed, measured, etc.) ....]"
("Marginal Notes on Adolph Wagner's
'Lehrbuch der politischen Okonomie'",
_Theoretical Practice_,  Spring 1972,  p. 53).

[NB: in the original both 'use-value' and
'estimated' appear as above with quotation
marks.]

Note here that this 'estimation' of use-value
does not mean that use-value as such has a
quantitative dimension. Rather, it means -- it
seems to me -- that the prospective use-value
is *accessed* -- i.e. there is an 'evaluation' of
quality --  prior to the sale of the commodity
by the prospective buyer.  As what is being
accessed ('investigated') is *quality* that is to
be used for *determinat*'  (individual, specific) purposes, there is no
standard magnitude that can
serve as a measure of  the 'estimation'  of
use-value.

In solidarity, Jerry

Dr. Steve Keen Senior Lecturer Economics & Finance Campbelltown, Building 11 Room 30, School of Economics and Finance UNIVERSITY WESTERN SYDNEY LOCKED BAG 1797 PENRITH SOUTH DC NSW 1797 Australia s.keen@xxxxxxxxxx 61 2 4620-3016 Fax 61 2 4626-6683 Home 02 9558-8018 Mobile 0409 716 088 Home Page: http://bus.uws.edu.au/steve-keen/



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]