IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
It is unclear to me in what edition of Volume 1 of
*Capital* on 'p. 188' Steve K cited below in [5189].
However, for reference, it is from Ch. 7, Section 2
in a paragraph that begins "Let us examine the
matter more closely." In the Kerr edition, this
paragraph is on pp. 215-216. In the International
(1939) edition, see pp. 174-175. In the Penguin ed.,
see pp. 300-301. An interesting difference in
translation concerns "the value which that labor-
power creates in the labor process" (Kerr) vs.
"the value that labour-power valorizes [*verwertet*]
in the labour-process" (Penguin). Note that in all
cases the VLP and the "value that ...." concern
value as such, not uv.
In solidarity, Jerry
- The past labor that is embodied in the labor power, and the
- living labor that it can call into action; the daily cost of
- maintaining it, and its daily expenditure in work, are two
- totally different things. *The former determines the
- exchange-value of the labor power, the latter is its use-value.*
- The fact that half a [working] day's labor is necessary to keep
- the laborer alive during 24 hours, does not in any way prevent
- him from working a whole day. Therefore, the value of labor
- power, and the value which that labor power creates in the labor
- process, are two entirely different magnitudes; and this
- difference of the two values was what the capitalist had in
- view, when he was purchasing the labor power... What really
- influenced him was the specific use-value which this commodity
- possesses of being a source not only of value, but of more value
- than it has itself. This is the special service that the
- capitalist expects from labor power, and in this transaction he
- acts in accordance with the 'eternal laws' of the exchange of
- commodities. *The seller of labor power, like the seller of any
- other commodity, realizes its exchange-value, and parts with its
- use-value.* (capital I, p. 188.)
- [OPE-L:5189] Re: Re: use-value as qualitative, (continued)
- [OPE-L:5189] Re: Re: use-value as qualitative, Steve Keen Fri 16 Mar 2001, 20:34 GMT
- [OPE-L:5190] if somebody is interested in Minsky, riccardo bellofiore Sat 17 Mar 2001, 11:12 GMT
- [OPE-L:5191] Re: if somebody is interested in Minsky, Gerald_A_Levy Sat 17 Mar 2001, 12:42 GMT
- [OPE-L:5212] Re: Re: Re: use-value as qualitative, Gerald_A_Levy Tue 20 Mar 2001, 15:08 GMT
- [OPE-L:5217] Re: Re: Re: Re: use-value as qualitative, Steve Keen Tue 20 Mar 2001, 20:01 GMT
- [OPE-L:5237] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: use-value as qualitative, Francisco Paulo Cipolla Thu 22 Mar 2001, 13:43 GMT
- [OPE-L:5244] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: use-value as qualitative, Steve Keen Fri 23 Mar 2001, 22:22 GMT
- [OPE-L:5176] Re: Re: Re: double divrgence, Fred B. Moseley Thu 15 Mar 2001, 14:31 GMT
- [OPE-L:5173] Re: Re: Re: waste, value, and potential, paul bullock Thu 15 Mar 2001, 12:33 GMT