OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

[OPE-L:5176] Re: Re: Re: double divrgence

To: ope-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OPE-L:5176] Re: Re: Re: double divrgence
From: "Fred B. Moseley" <fmoseley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:32:00 -0500 (EST)

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.

Rakesh,

I am leaving town today on a family vacation for a week.  When I return, I
would like to get back to our discussion of the "two reasons for
divergence" and the average commodity.  Thanks for your patience.

Comradely,
Fred

Prev by Date: [OPE-L:5175] Re: Re: Re: Re: waste, value, and potential
Next by Date: [OPE-L:5177] Re: was Marx an economist?
Previous by thread: [OPE-L:5173] Re: Re: Re: waste, value, and potential
Next by thread: [OPE-L:5186] capacity utilization and the transfer and depreciation of the value of means of production
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [OPE-L:5212] Re: Re: Re: use-value as qualitative, (continued)
- [OPE-L:5176] Re: Re: Re: double divrgence, Fred B. Moseley Thu 15 Mar 2001, 14:31 GMT
- [OPE-L:5173] Re: Re: Re: waste, value, and potential, paul bullock Thu 15 Mar 2001, 12:33 GMT
  - [OPE-L:5175] Re: Re: Re: Re: waste, value, and potential, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 15 Mar 2001, 13:52 GMT
  - [OPE-L:5185] Re: Re: Re: Re: waste, value, and potential, Paul Cockshott Fri 16 Mar 2001, 10:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:5172] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: waste, value, and potential, paul bullock Thu 15 Mar 2001, 12:33 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]