IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari wrote: > Paul C, why would military development at least in the short run > come at the expense of modernizing the means of production if the > imperial country can import skilled labor and capital at will? The country doing the military spending may be able to import skilled labour and capital "without let or hindrance", but they can't import these things _free of charge_. Access to international trade doesn't alter the basic trade-off that Paul is talking about. Allin Cottrell.
- [OPE-L:5122] Re: Re: Re: waste, value, and potential, glevy Thu 08 Mar 2001, 20:17 GMT
- [OPE-L:5118] Fwd: Re: productive labour, Paul Cockshott Thu 08 Mar 2001, 11:51 GMT
- [OPE-L:5119] (un) productive labour, the state and technological change, Gerald_A_Levy Thu 08 Mar 2001, 13:16 GMT
- [OPE-L:5120] Re: Fwd: Re: productive labour, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari Thu 08 Mar 2001, 19:26 GMT
- [OPE-L:5125] Re: Re: Fwd: Re: productive labour, Allin Cottrell Thu 08 Mar 2001, 21:24 GMT
- [OPE-L:5126] Re: Re: Re: Fwd: Re: productive labour, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari Thu 08 Mar 2001, 22:30 GMT
- [OPE-L:5127] transformation again, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari Thu 08 Mar 2001, 23:02 GMT
- [OPE-L:5128] comparative statics, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari Thu 08 Mar 2001, 23:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:5130] Re: comparative statics, Steve Keen Fri 09 Mar 2001, 04:38 GMT