IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
>That should have been "need not" embrace idealism, of course; I was in a >hurry when I typed that! Sorry, >Steve Is entertaining the possibility of many parallel universes more Marxist or less reactionary or indeed less idealist than Bohr's "idealism"? Should the interpretation be judged on such a political basis? rnb
- [OPE-L:3527] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, (continued)
- [OPE-L:3527] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Paul Cockshott Thu 22 Jun 2000, 11:39 GMT
- [OPE-L:3520] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Steve Keen Mon 19 Jun 2000, 19:31 GMT
- [OPE-L:3519] Aristotle, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 17:36 GMT
- [OPE-L:3518] Aristole, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 17:28 GMT
- [OPE-L:3517] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 17:09 GMT
- [OPE-L:3516] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 17:04 GMT
- [OPE-L:3515] Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 16:23 GMT
- [OPE-L:3523] Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Paul Cockshott Wed 21 Jun 2000, 08:34 GMT
- [OPE-L:3524] Re: Historical materialsm, Paul Cockshott Wed 21 Jun 2000, 08:50 GMT