IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
>On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, Paul Cockshott wrote:
>
>> Beyond that I regard the Copenhagen interpretation as itself
>> being an idealist interpretation of the subject matter.
>
>IMO the starting point for New Age appropriations of quantum
>mechanics is not actually Bohr's interpretation
>("Complementarity", the idea that nature is irreducibly
>stochastic), but rather the notion von Neumann introduced, that
>the collapse of the wave-function is located in the
>consciousness of "the observer".
>
>Allin Cottrell.
Lindley indeed argues that Wigner, along with von Neumann, took quite
seriously this possibility of the interaction of brainfunction and wave
function.
rnb
- [OPE-L:3520] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Steve Keen Mon 19 Jun 2000, 19:31 GMT
- [OPE-L:3519] Aristotle, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 17:36 GMT
- [OPE-L:3518] Aristole, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 17:28 GMT
- [OPE-L:3517] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 17:09 GMT
- [OPE-L:3516] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 17:04 GMT
- [OPE-L:3515] Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Rakesh Bhandari Mon 19 Jun 2000, 16:23 GMT
- [OPE-L:3523] Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Paul Cockshott Wed 21 Jun 2000, 08:34 GMT
- [OPE-L:3524] Re: Historical materialsm, Paul Cockshott Wed 21 Jun 2000, 08:50 GMT
- [OPE-L:3513] Re: Re: Re: Re: Marxism and 19th century materialism, Steve Keen Mon 19 Jun 2000, 14:30 GMT