IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
I. Regional trade associations ===========================
> The problem with nafta is that it is not a currency union.
True, but one can have a customs union without a currency union.
The original question is how one values the import content of goods in terms of labour time. This problem arises because one has in the i/o tables figures for the imports used by various industries given in money terms. You want to convert these money figures into equivalent labour fingures.
A money i/o table can only be constructed if you use a single unit of account - typically the national currency. Thus you can only construct monetary i/o tables within a given currency union. A customs union with multiple monetary units would have to be described by multiple i/o tables.
That is why the original question of how to value the imports row of an i/o table in labour time only arises when dealing with the relations between a currency union and the rest of the world.
- [OPE-L:3504] updated listing of current and former subscribers, Jerry Levy Fri 16 Jun 2000, 15:11 GMT
- [OPE-L:3503] Re: currency unions, Jerry Levy Fri 16 Jun 2000, 14:55 GMT
- [OPE-L:3502] ...and on the seventh day..., P . J . Wells Thu 15 Jun 2000, 18:45 GMT
- [OPE-L:3500] Re: valuation of imports, Jerry Levy Wed 14 Jun 2000, 17:02 GMT
- [OPE-L:3501] Re: currency unions, Paul Cockshott Thu 15 Jun 2000, 12:39 GMT
- [OPE-L:3499] Aristotle, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 14 Jun 2000, 16:20 GMT
- [OPE-L:3498] Aristotle, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 14 Jun 2000, 14:21 GMT
- [OPE-L:3497] Tony Tinker, glevy Wed 14 Jun 2000, 13:21 GMT
- [OPE-L:3495] Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 13 Jun 2000, 04:24 GMT