OPE-L
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

[OPE-L:3501] Re: currency unions



You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.


At 11:02 14/06/00 -0600, Jerry Levy wrote:

I. Regional trade associations ===========================

> The problem with nafta is that it is not a currency union.

True, but one can have a customs union without a currency union.

The original question is how one values the import content of goods in terms of labour time. This problem arises because one has in the i/o tables figures for the imports used by various industries given in money terms. You want to convert these money figures into equivalent labour fingures.

A money i/o table can only be constructed if you use a single
unit of account - typically the national currency. Thus you can
only construct monetary i/o tables within a given currency union.
A customs union with multiple monetary units would have to
be described by multiple i/o tables.

That is why the original question of how to value the imports
row of an i/o table in labour time only arises when dealing with
the relations between a currency union and the rest of the world.




Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]