IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
if something has certain attributes only in virtue of its form, then isn't form both explanatory principle/factor and causal force? It seems to me that if the conception of causality is reduced on both semantic and ontological grounds to event generatation by energy transfer from one entity to another (Bunge), then we can't by definition think of form as a cause in either a semantic or ontological sense. But do we get into too much metaphysical trouble if we open up the conception of causality in either a semantic or ontological sense (the Darwinian Ernst Mayr seems not to thinks so); moreover, does Marx need formal causality to have both senses? If we can't even have either, then I think Marx's theory is in big trouble. Yours, Rakesh
- [OPE-L:3503] Re: currency unions, Jerry Levy Fri 16 Jun 2000, 14:55 GMT
- [OPE-L:3502] ...and on the seventh day..., P . J . Wells Thu 15 Jun 2000, 18:45 GMT
- [OPE-L:3500] Re: valuation of imports, Jerry Levy Wed 14 Jun 2000, 17:02 GMT
- [OPE-L:3501] Re: currency unions, Paul Cockshott Thu 15 Jun 2000, 12:39 GMT
- [OPE-L:3499] Aristotle, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 14 Jun 2000, 16:20 GMT
- [OPE-L:3498] Aristotle, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 14 Jun 2000, 14:21 GMT
- [OPE-L:3497] Tony Tinker, glevy Wed 14 Jun 2000, 13:21 GMT
- [OPE-L:3495] Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 13 Jun 2000, 04:24 GMT
- [OPE-L:3494] measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 13 Jun 2000, 04:23 GMT