IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
>Re Paul C's 3459 >I think that you are confusing value with exchange value here. To operate >effectively as an exchange value it must be sold, but it has value >independently >of being sold. Value and exchange value are not the same thing. Exchange >value is the form of representation of value to the economic agents, but is >not itself value. Well, I emphasize distinction between value and price because even upon measurement of commodities there is no good clasical knowlege that comes of it. Wavefunctions collapse into measurements; values remain unknown even after price measurement (some of the reasons why have already been elucidated by Michael P). Yours, Rakesh
- [OPE-L:3476] Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 10 Jun 2000, 20:51 GMT
- [OPE-L:3475] Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Sat 10 Jun 2000, 16:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:3474] Re: Re: Re: further replies to Gil, Gil Skillman Fri 09 Jun 2000, 19:24 GMT
- [OPE-L:3471] Re: Re: measurement of value and shadow prices, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:47 GMT
- [OPE-L:3470] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:47 GMT
- [OPE-L:3469] Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:47 GMT
- [OPE-L:3473] Re: measurement of value, Andrew Brown Fri 09 Jun 2000, 17:14 GMT
- [OPE-L:3468] float plan, Jerry Levy Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:16 GMT
- [OPE-L:3467] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:10 GMT