IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Re Ajit's 3465 >Furthermore, I think it is simply wrong to think in terms of whether a >unit of a >particular commodity is been sold or not. Let's say 100 tons of steel was >produced. 95 tons were sold and 5 tons were added to the inventory. What is the >serious theoretical problem in following the usual practice of counting the >inventories as sold by the enterprise to itself? Cheers, ajit sinha Then anything which has been produced but not sold on the market becomes a form of value production, in particular government orders. This procedure would erase the distinction between production and capitalist production and thereby undercut the theory of the limits of the mixed economy. At any rate, inventories are superposed commodities which have not yet been collapsed. Yours, Rakesh
- [OPE-L:3470] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:47 GMT
- [OPE-L:3469] Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:47 GMT
- [OPE-L:3473] Re: measurement of value, Andrew Brown Fri 09 Jun 2000, 17:14 GMT
- [OPE-L:3468] float plan, Jerry Levy Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:16 GMT
- [OPE-L:3467] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:10 GMT
- [OPE-L:3480] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Ajit Sinha Sun 11 Jun 2000, 12:50 GMT
- [OPE-L:3466] Re: Gil's necessary conditions, Jerry Levy Fri 09 Jun 2000, 13:42 GMT
- [OPE-L:3472] Re: Re: Gil's necessary conditions, Gil Skillman Fri 09 Jun 2000, 16:08 GMT
- [OPE-L:3462] shadow prices, Paul Cockshott Fri 09 Jun 2000, 10:06 GMT