IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Michael Williams" <mwilliam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [OPE-L:3456] Re: Gil's necessary conditions Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:33:31 +0100 A brief comment on what looks like a methdological chasm between Gil and at least some of his interlocutors > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ope-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-ope-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Gil Skillman > Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 12:03 AM > To: ope-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [OPE-L:3456] Re: Gil's necessary conditions Gil writes: > As a result the existence of surplus value is logically > *possible* even given price-value equivalence. *But the significance of > capitalist production for capitalist exploitation does not in any way lie > in the existence of this mere logical *possibility*--capitalists don't > consciously or unconsciously take direct control of production conditions > in order to be able to reap surplus value even under price-value > equivalence. This is to completely misunderstand the process of abstraction involved in what I have called Marx's 'even-if' logic. This requires neither that price-value equivalence exists nor that capitalists take it into account in their decision making. One can always immunize one's argument against criticism by hopping about between levels of abstraction. Michael ____________________ Dr Michael Williams Economics and Social Sciences De Montfort University Milton Keynes MK7 6HP UK tel: +1908 834876 [Home: +23 80768641] fax: 0870 133 1147 <mailto:mike.williams@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.mk.dmu.ac.uk/~mwilliam [This message may be in html, and any attachments may be in MSWord 2000. If you have difficulty reading either, please let me know.] ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
- [OPE-L:3473] Re: measurement of value, (continued)
- [OPE-L:3473] Re: measurement of value, Andrew Brown Fri 09 Jun 2000, 17:14 GMT
- [OPE-L:3468] float plan, Jerry Levy Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:16 GMT
- [OPE-L:3467] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Fri 09 Jun 2000, 14:10 GMT
- [OPE-L:3480] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Ajit Sinha Sun 11 Jun 2000, 12:50 GMT
- [OPE-L:3466] Re: Gil's necessary conditions, Jerry Levy Fri 09 Jun 2000, 13:42 GMT
- [OPE-L:3472] Re: Re: Gil's necessary conditions, Gil Skillman Fri 09 Jun 2000, 16:08 GMT
- [OPE-L:3462] shadow prices, Paul Cockshott Fri 09 Jun 2000, 10:06 GMT
- [OPE-L:3460] Details of Value Theory Symposium 29th and 30th June, Greenwich, Alan Freeman Fri 09 Jun 2000, 09:58 GMT
- [OPE-L:3458] determination of constant capital, Fred B. Moseley Fri 09 Jun 2000, 05:04 GMT