IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Rakesh Bhandari wrote: > Paul C wrote: > > >The point is that from the standpoint of the US economy the value of its > >inputs is determined by the amount of its labour that it has to give up > >in order to produce the exports required to obtain an import. > > The US as reserve center does not have to give up anything for imports; it > gets them through the accumulation of an inflationary surplus of dollars > abroad. Trade deficits and surpluses complicate the matter, but it's absurd to suggest that the US runs (or would be able to run) a deficit equal to the value of imports. Allin.
- [OPE-L:3448] Re: Re: valuation of imports, Rakesh Bhandari Wed 07 Jun 2000, 01:52 GMT
- [OPE-L:3449] Re: Re: Re: valuation of imports, Allin Cottrell Wed 07 Jun 2000, 02:22 GMT
- [OPE-L:3447] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value, Steve Keen Tue 06 Jun 2000, 18:44 GMT
- [OPE-L:3445] valuation of imports, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 06 Jun 2000, 16:16 GMT
- [OPE-L:3446] Re: valuation of imports, Allin Cottrell Tue 06 Jun 2000, 18:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:3444] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 06 Jun 2000, 14:49 GMT
- [OPE-L:3441] Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value, Rakesh Bhandari Tue 06 Jun 2000, 14:15 GMT
- [OPE-L:3443] valuation of imports, Paul Cockshott Tue 06 Jun 2000, 14:42 GMT
- [OPE-L:3440] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value, Steve Keen Tue 06 Jun 2000, 10:16 GMT