IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
P.S.--I should have also waited to take Mike L.'s post to study. Now that I (finally) see his ultimate point, I'll have to redraft my response to make sure I'm not attempting to have my analytical cake and eat it, too. So to speak. GS >Responses are due from me to Rakesh (2 posts), Fred, and Allin (at least), >but it's late and our computer system is about to shut down for some >maintenance. I'll take the recent posts home with me & study them until >things are back up and running. Gil >
- [OPE-L:3419] Re: Gil's criticisms, glevy Fri 02 Jun 2000, 14:49 GMT
- [OPE-L:3412] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 01 Jun 2000, 20:31 GMT
- [OPE-L:3411] Re: Re: Re: Gil's criticisms, Gil Skillman Thu 01 Jun 2000, 20:24 GMT
- [OPE-L:3429] Re: Re: Re: Re: Gil's criticisms, michael a. lebowitz Sun 04 Jun 2000, 17:34 GMT
- [OPE-L:3410] Re: Re: further replies to Gil, Gil Skillman Thu 01 Jun 2000, 19:52 GMT
- [OPE-L:3409] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 01 Jun 2000, 16:42 GMT
- [OPE-L:3417] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: measurement of value, Paul Cockshott Fri 02 Jun 2000, 09:44 GMT
- [OPE-L:3408] Re: Re: Gil's criticisms, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 01 Jun 2000, 16:24 GMT
- [OPE-L:3407] Re: Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value, Rakesh Bhandari Thu 01 Jun 2000, 16:10 GMT