IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 coslap@xxxxxxx quoted Duncan: > "If capitalists are trying to move capital into the gold > industry to capture higher than average rates of profit, > won't they bid up the prices of labor and other inputs to > gold production? Isn't this a possible mechanism for > equalizing profit rates that doesn't involve the quantity > theory?" and responded: > I suppose that this is true, and analogous to what happens > in other sectors... To some degree, but doesn't Duncan's argument threaten to do too much work? If the attempt to get into some industry X that is earning super-normal profit simply drives up the prices of inputs to that industry to the point where its profit rate is reduced to normal, then profit-rate equalization occurs without any transfers of real resources between uses, nor any movement of final output prices: do we think that's right? I think Costas's orignal question stands; of course it's pretty much academic given the limited historical span of true commodity-money systems, but I think that Ricardo's answer is quite OK. Allin Cottrell.
- [OPE-L:2224] Re: socialism in a single moon?, Gerald Levy Wed 19 Jan 2000, 10:20 GMT
- [OPE-L:2213] World Money, Gerald Levy Tue 18 Jan 2000, 19:23 GMT
- [OPE-L:2212] Gold and QMT, Akira MATSUMOTO Tue 18 Jan 2000, 17:38 GMT
- [OPE-L:2234] Gold and QMT, coslap Wed 19 Jan 2000, 19:10 GMT
- [OPE-L:2240] Re: Gold and QMT, Allin Cottrell Wed 19 Jan 2000, 21:08 GMT
- [OPE-L:2255] Re: Gold and QMT, Akira MATSUMOTO Thu 20 Jan 2000, 18:29 GMT
- [OPE-L:2209] Fw: value-form theory and socialism, Michael J Williams Tue 18 Jan 2000, 10:58 GMT
- [OPE-L:2202] Do they know they're hungry ?, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 18 Jan 2000, 00:22 GMT
- [OPE-L:2197] Toni Negri - Letter regarding "Posse", Gerald Levy Mon 17 Jan 2000, 19:22 GMT