IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
Paul wrote: > I would say that F&M's argument starts to operate once the system > has a few tens of degrees of freedom. > > Perhaps Julian and Allin might have some estimate here. > > Well, I may do -- but not for a couple of years yet...PhD still in progress :-) In the meantime, me not being a real mathematician or physicist, can Paul say how many d.f.s one needs in, e.g., an ideal gas? Julian >
- [OPE-L:2247] Re: Socialism in a single moon?, (continued)
- [OPE-L:2247] Re: Socialism in a single moon?, Steve Keen Wed 19 Jan 2000, 22:46 GMT
- [OPE-L:2237] FW: Re: Statistical regularities, P . J . Wells Wed 19 Jan 2000, 19:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:2243] Re: FW: Re: Statistical regularities, Michael J Williams Wed 19 Jan 2000, 22:07 GMT
- [OPE-L:2236] Bulgarian agriculture, Gerald Levy Wed 19 Jan 2000, 19:11 GMT
- [OPE-L:2235] RE: Re: Re: Statistical regularities, P . J . Wells Wed 19 Jan 2000, 19:10 GMT
- [OPE-L:2241] Re: RE: Re: Re: Statistical regularities, Allin Cottrell Wed 19 Jan 2000, 21:10 GMT
- [OPE-L:2232] RE: Re: Statistical regularities, P . J . Wells Wed 19 Jan 2000, 18:31 GMT
- [OPE-L:2230] value form, C. J. Arthur Wed 19 Jan 2000, 15:38 GMT
- [OPE-L:2245] Re: value form, Michael J Williams Wed 19 Jan 2000, 22:08 GMT