IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> Summary: I see problems in Marx, I would like to resolve them maintaining > both the money measure and the time measure, the answer is not the > sequentialist à la Carchedi-Freeman-Kliman or the VFT à la Reuten and (the > last) Arthur. This should be argued better and in detail, but I have to ask > the people interested to look at my papers to understand my (unfinished!!) > theoretical project. My sentiments as well.
- [OPE-L:2264] Re: Re: Re: value-form theories and fetishism, (continued)
- [OPE-L:2264] Re: Re: Re: value-form theories and fetishism, riccardo bellofiore Fri 21 Jan 2000, 13:54 GMT
- [OPE-L:2192] Re: Re: value-form theories, Michael J Williams Mon 17 Jan 2000, 16:35 GMT
- [OPE-L:2199] Re: : value-form theories, Geert REUTEN Mon 17 Jan 2000, 21:18 GMT
- [OPE-L:2218] Re: Re: value-form theories, riccardo bellofiore Wed 19 Jan 2000, 09:18 GMT
- [OPE-L:2222] Re: Re: Re: value-form theories, clyder Wed 19 Jan 2000, 09:43 GMT
- [OPE-L:2225] Re: Re: Re: value-form theories, Michael J Williams Wed 19 Jan 2000, 12:25 GMT
- [OPE-L:2228] Re: Re: Re: Re: value-form theories, riccardo bellofiore Wed 19 Jan 2000, 14:45 GMT
- [OPE-L:2244] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: value-form theories, Michael J Williams Wed 19 Jan 2000, 22:07 GMT
- [OPE-L:2252] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: value-form theories, riccardo bellofiore Thu 20 Jan 2000, 14:43 GMT