IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> Mike W wrote: > > 3. Whilst Money and markets seem to be necessary conditions of existence > of > the value-form, it is not the case that money and markets will necessarily > tend to re-instate the dominance of the value-form. > > Could we have some elaboration of this? In my limited studies of VFT I've > always had the impression that the former were sufficient conditions for > the latter -- but maybe I was simply reading in my own preconceptions > here... > > > 5. The central role of fetishism and alienation in the conditioning of > human > agency by value-form determined social structure suggests that it will be > difficult to create the silk purse of socialism without rectifying the > pig's > ear that capitalism has made of human nature. > > Can I take it that Mike sees these as simultaneous processes? > > Julian
- [OPE-L:2194] Re: Re: [OPE-L:2141]Thermodynamics, nicola taylor Mon 17 Jan 2000, 16:56 GMT
- [OPE-L:2191] Fw: Re: [OPE-L:2141]Thermodynamics, Michael J Williams Mon 17 Jan 2000, 16:35 GMT
- [OPE-L:2190] Fw: Re: [OPE-L:2141]Thermodynamics, clyder Mon 17 Jan 2000, 16:34 GMT
- [OPE-L:2189] Fw: Re: Re: Re: value-form theories, clyder Mon 17 Jan 2000, 16:34 GMT
- [OPE-L:2185] FW: Re: Re: value-form theory and socialism, P . J . Wells Mon 17 Jan 2000, 15:20 GMT
- [OPE-L:2193] Re: FW: Re: Re: value-form theory and socialism, Michael J Williams Mon 17 Jan 2000, 16:35 GMT
- [OPE-L:2195] Re: Re: Re: value-form theory and socialism, Jurriaan Bendien Mon 17 Jan 2000, 18:08 GMT
- [OPE-L:2200] Re: Re: Re: Re: value-form theory and socialism, Michael J Williams Mon 17 Jan 2000, 22:44 GMT
- [OPE-L:2184] FW: Re: [OPE-L:2141]Thermodynamics, P . J . Wells Mon 17 Jan 2000, 15:20 GMT