IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
>The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of >social, political and intellectual life. It is not the consciousness of men >that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines >their consciousness. Yes, "bedingen" does mean, in modern German at least, to cause, to require, to stipulate in the sense of a necessity, a necessary condition or necessary relation, or a prerequisite. "Bestimmen" means to determine or define, but various kinds of determination could be intended. Thus e.g. "bestimmen" could mean "set limits upon" or "delimits" or "defines the boundaries". A single object or event might be "bestimmt" by numerous different determinations or definitions. Needless to say, Marx is talking in the sense of a sociological generalisation, in an overall, historical sense, in reaction to the Hegelian idealist philosophers. Obviously the consciousness of human beings does determine their social existence to a great extent at the level of individuals and groups. Otherwise social change would become a mystery. Marx is seeking to explain how ideas and conceptual systems spring from the production of material life, become detached from it, and react back on it, and what determines this historical movement. For some interesting remarks on this topic, see Ernest Mandel, "Die Dialektik von Produktivkraften, Produktionsverhaltenissen und Klassenkampf neben Kategorien der Latenz und des Parametrische Determinismus in der materialistischen Geschichtsauffassung" (Presentation in Bochum, 29 October, 1987). In: Die versteinerten Verhaltenisse zum tanzen bringen. Beitrage zur Marxistischen Theorie heute. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1991. pp. 100-112. Mandel writes, "Um die materialistische Geschichtsauffassung materialistisch zu verstehen, muss man davon ausgehen, dass man die Welt nicht bewusst veranderen kann, wenn mann sie nicht richtig interpretiert" (p. 100). That is, "to understand the materialist conception of history materialistically, our point of departure has to be that one cannot change the world consciously, if one doesn't interpret it correctly". That would seem to be the end of all wisdom. In solidarity Jurriaan
- [OPE-L:2186] Re: Re: [OPE-L:2141]Thermodynamics, (continued)
- Message not available
- [OPE-L:2186] Re: Re: [OPE-L:2141]Thermodynamics, Michael J Williams Mon 17 Jan 2000, 15:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:2161] RE: Re: Re: Markets and Information, P . J . Wells Sat 15 Jan 2000, 09:58 GMT
- [OPE-L:2170] Re: RE: Re: Re: Markets and Information, Allin Cottrell Sun 16 Jan 2000, 15:37 GMT
- [OPE-L:2157] Fw: Re: echt Deutsch, Michael J Williams Fri 14 Jan 2000, 20:05 GMT
- [OPE-L:2164] Re: Fw: Re: echt Deutsch, Jurriaan Bendien Sat 15 Jan 2000, 20:11 GMT
- [OPE-L:2168] Re: Re: Fw: Re: echt Deutsch, Jurriaan Bendien Sat 15 Jan 2000, 22:45 GMT
- [OPE-L:2166] Re: echt Deutsch, C. J. Arthur Sat 15 Jan 2000, 21:40 GMT
- [OPE-L:2153] Re: value-form theories, Andrew Brown Fri 14 Jan 2000, 16:47 GMT
- [OPE-L:2210] Re: Re: value-form theories: substance and pure form, Michael J Williams Tue 18 Jan 2000, 14:07 GMT