IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> > Do I understand you to mean, then, that workers' collectives in industry > would be capitalist--- even in the absence of wage-labour-- if they > purchase inputs on the market and sell their outputs there as well? Yes. This was the thrust of Engels argument against Duhring. >Let me > stress that I think the *tendency* to capitalism is present in commodity > exchange but that is not the same as saying this is capitalism.
- [OPE-L:2103] Re: Re: Re: *What will happen in the 21st Century?*, (continued)
- [OPE-L:2103] Re: Re: Re: *What will happen in the 21st Century?*, clyder Wed 12 Jan 2000, 09:47 GMT
- [OPE-L:2126] markets and reproduction, michael a. lebowitz Thu 13 Jan 2000, 07:54 GMT
- [OPE-L:2129] Re: markets and reproduction, clyder Thu 13 Jan 2000, 10:12 GMT
- [OPE-L:2143] Re: Re: markets and reproduction, michael a. lebowitz Fri 14 Jan 2000, 09:33 GMT
- [OPE-L:2147] Re: Re: Re: markets and reproduction, clyder Fri 14 Jan 2000, 10:04 GMT
- [OPE-L:2151] Re: Re: Re: Re: markets and reproduction, Jurriaan Bendien Fri 14 Jan 2000, 13:50 GMT
- [OPE-L:2159] Re: Markets and Information, Duncan K. Foley Fri 14 Jan 2000, 21:19 GMT
- [OPE-L:2160] Re: Re: Markets and Information, Allin Cottrell Sat 15 Jan 2000, 04:32 GMT
- [OPE-L:2206] Re: Re: Re: Markets and Information, Duncan K. Foley Tue 18 Jan 2000, 03:46 GMT