IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, John Ernst wrote: > For those who want to start with labor hours in order to get > a set of prices, differential rent becomes a problem as well > since its very existence indicates that not all actual hours > of labor create the same value even if we assume that all > labor is simple labor. That's not my understanding: I'd say that the existence of differential rent drives prices away from values for the affected commodities, not that it alters the values of the commodities. The infra-marginal output ends up selling for a price above its value. Allin Cottrell.
- [OPE-L:2150] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: gold, (continued)
- [OPE-L:2150] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: gold, Allin Cottrell Fri 14 Jan 2000, 13:48 GMT
- Message not available
- [OPE-L:2154] gold rates of profit, coslap Fri 14 Jan 2000, 18:32 GMT
- [OPE-L:2221] Re: Re: gold, Tsoulfidis Lefteris Wed 19 Jan 2000, 09:26 GMT
- [OPE-L:2137] Re: Gold and rent, John Ernst Thu 13 Jan 2000, 16:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:2142] Re: Re: Gold and rent, Allin Cottrell Thu 13 Jan 2000, 19:58 GMT
- [OPE-L:2131] RE: Re: markets and reproduction, P . J . Wells Thu 13 Jan 2000, 10:40 GMT
- [OPE-L:2133] Re: RE: Re: markets and reproduction, clyder Thu 13 Jan 2000, 11:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:2127] Re: gold, Gerald Levy Thu 13 Jan 2000, 08:53 GMT
- [OPE-L:2119] Re: Re: Re: Why is Malthus correct on unproductive labor, according to Marx?, Paul Cockshott Wed 12 Jan 2000, 21:11 GMT