IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> Basically with you Paul I always get the idea you see the transition to > socialism emerging out of a war. But there are different kinds of wars, and > some novel ways to fight wars these days. So the model of economic planning > in World War 2 may not be so relevant anymore. Its just the bias of my Leninism - epoch of wars and revolutions etc - showing through.
- [OPE-L:2133] Re: RE: Re: markets and reproduction, (continued)
- [OPE-L:2133] Re: RE: Re: markets and reproduction, clyder Thu 13 Jan 2000, 11:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:2127] Re: gold, Gerald Levy Thu 13 Jan 2000, 08:53 GMT
- [OPE-L:2119] Re: Re: Re: Why is Malthus correct on unproductive labor, according to Marx?, Paul Cockshott Wed 12 Jan 2000, 21:11 GMT
- [OPE-L:2122] Re: Re: Re: Re: Why is Malthus correct on unproductive labor, according to Marx?, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 12 Jan 2000, 23:39 GMT
- [OPE-L:2128] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why is Malthus correct on unproductive labor, according to Marx?, clyder Thu 13 Jan 2000, 09:50 GMT
- [OPE-L:2132] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why is Malthus correct on unproductive labor, according to Marx?, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 13 Jan 2000, 10:44 GMT
- [OPE-L:2138] imperialism, wars and revolutions, Gerald Levy Thu 13 Jan 2000, 18:05 GMT
- [OPE-L:2140] Re: imperialism, wars and revolutions, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 13 Jan 2000, 18:56 GMT
- [OPE-L:2146] Re: imperialism, wars and revolutions, clyder Fri 14 Jan 2000, 10:02 GMT