IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 P.J.Wells@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Fair enough (I'd rather suspected something of the sort), > but the obvious next question is "So why do they do it?" > > "Advertising" would be my first guess -- what would a US > commercial bank be willing to pay to get its name on every > dollar bill, I wonder? Yes. Also I believe there's a slim economic advantage: a Scottish bank has to hold backing Bank of England notes only for those of its own notes that are actually put into circulation, not for those just sitting in the coffers, thus they are able to economize on "till money" relative to their English counterparts. Allin Cottrell.
- [OPE-L:2134] Re: Re: Re: Re: gold, (continued)
- [OPE-L:2134] Re: Re: Re: Re: gold, Tsoulfidis Lefteris Thu 13 Jan 2000, 12:02 GMT
- [OPE-L:2158] Re: Re: Re: Re: gold, Duncan K. Foley Fri 14 Jan 2000, 21:19 GMT
- [OPE-L:2102] RE: Re: State theory of money, P . J . Wells Wed 12 Jan 2000, 08:55 GMT
- [OPE-L:2106] Re: RE: Re: State theory of money, clyder Wed 12 Jan 2000, 10:08 GMT
- [OPE-L:2114] Re: RE: Re: State theory of money, Allin Cottrell Wed 12 Jan 2000, 18:10 GMT
- [OPE-L:2092] State theory of money, P . J . Wells Tue 11 Jan 2000, 21:22 GMT
- [OPE-L:2094] Re: State theory of money, Allin Cottrell Tue 11 Jan 2000, 22:03 GMT
- [OPE-L:2105] Re: State theory of money, clyder Wed 12 Jan 2000, 09:53 GMT
- [OPE-L:2090] Surplus product in communist society?, P . J . Wells Tue 11 Jan 2000, 20:05 GMT