IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
----- Original Message ----- From: <P.J.Wells@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <ope-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 8:05 PM Subject: [OPE-L:2090] Surplus product in communist society? > Claus wrote > > > If the society is expected to continue expanding > > the well being of its members, there has to be a surplus product, which > > is, > > however, appropriated by the social body, not only by a part of it, i.e., > > it is no longer surplus value. > > > I'm uneasy about the notion of a "surplus product" in a communist > society. > > Mention of a surplus immediately invites the question "surplus to > what?" Surplus to the immediate needs of simple reproduction of the working population. Examples: maintainance of defence industries to defend against attack by capitalist states supporting those who are to old and infirm to work investing in scientific research investing in new plant and equipment whose labour value is higher than that which it replaces
- [OPE-L:2094] Re: State theory of money, (continued)
- [OPE-L:2094] Re: State theory of money, Allin Cottrell Tue 11 Jan 2000, 22:03 GMT
- [OPE-L:2105] Re: State theory of money, clyder Wed 12 Jan 2000, 09:53 GMT
- [OPE-L:2090] Surplus product in communist society?, P . J . Wells Tue 11 Jan 2000, 20:05 GMT
- [OPE-L:2098] Re: Surplus product in communist society?, Jurriaan Bendien Tue 11 Jan 2000, 23:59 GMT
- [OPE-L:2104] Re: Surplus product in communist society?, clyder Wed 12 Jan 2000, 09:50 GMT
- [OPE-L:2111] Re: Re: Surplus product in communist society?, Jurriaan Bendien Wed 12 Jan 2000, 17:02 GMT
- [OPE-L:2086] Re: Gold (questions), John Ernst Tue 11 Jan 2000, 16:10 GMT
- [OPE-L:2097] Re: Re: Gold (questions), Jurriaan Bendien Tue 11 Jan 2000, 23:10 GMT
- [OPE-L:2082] Re: Gold (questions), John Ernst Tue 11 Jan 2000, 05:30 GMT